Criteria That Survive a Heated Meeting
How to weight evaluation criteria so vendor debates stay about evidence, not volume.
When stakeholders disagree, the loudest voice often wins. Written criteria change that dynamic. We teach teams to lock must-haves early, separate them from preferences, and score proofs of concept against the same sheet. The goal is not mathematical purity—it is a shared language that keeps the meeting about evidence. In practice sessions, participants rewrite vague criteria like “modern” or “scalable” into observable checks a vendor demo can actually fail.